498
the day when this Excellency introduced M. Clarke an his arrival from Shanghai instead of welcoming him with the courtesy due to
genstemand of professional)
standing and acquirements which at the
teres
least
ten?
quite
av
a
par with
had
you informed him that he
aow you
cque down to take MN! Bird!
half Salary from you.
14.
Wishwallacy would receive with
mcredulity
a
-statement of such an
avowedly selfish clarin to
av
exclusive
right to the puquisites of office,
not that Mr. Clarke in the Governor's
fresmeer
av
The day
were it
د
question charged
you with having just accused him of taking from you Mr Bird: half. Salary-
77
a
staterned which
did not then
deny. It is also curtain that not merly did you express youself aggrieved by Mr Clark's appointment defriving your of
a
half Salary
but
you subsequently
admitted to the Acting Colonial Secretary
had told My Clarke that
you had told
do what
Yar
yar
would
could to injure hime. You will observed that in forming
their opinions
Av
грешил
conduct in the
abour particulars, His Excellency and the
Cancil do not in the least found their
conclusions
av
the
11.13 1인
of Mr Clark. In the
supported statements
the
sanw
まいまいま
Concil hour formed their own
AA
to aw
of the
The reasons
conclusion
given by Mr
Clarke for the impossibility of his
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.